COVID-19 Update: Due to the current situation, here are some helpful resources | Learn More

St. Louis Post Dispatch: Missouri Supreme Court says state regulators erred in denial of Grain Belt Express transmission line

A long-stalled proposal for a multi-state electric transmission line was thrown a lifeline Tuesday, when the Missouri Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state regulators erred in rejecting the project based on a controversial legal precedent.

The proposed 780-mile Grain Belt Express project from Houston-based developer Clean Line Energy would span four states and distribute Kansas wind power as far as Indiana and beyond.

Missouri is the only state along the project’s path that has not previously granted it approval. Kansas, Illinois and Indiana — the other states the line would cross — previously OK’d the project years ago.

Tuesday’s decision capped an appeal Clean Line filed after the Missouri Public Service Commission denied the project last August.

The PSC based its rejection on a controversial appeals court ruling that said Ameren’s Mark Twain Transmission Project in northeast Missouri required assent from individual counties before it could be approved by state utility regulators. Even though they accepted that legal precedent, some commissioners voiced disagreement and warned that the lower court’s rationale would jeopardize future infrastructure development across Missouri.

The state Supreme Court said the precedent should not have been followed.

“The Commission’s reliance on (the decision in the Ameren case) was error,” Tuesday’s Supreme Court decision stated.

The decision went on to say the suggestion that “consent from every would-be affected county is required” prior to PSC approval for similar lines of infrastructure “should not be followed.”

The court ruling sends the matter back to the PSC to determine whether the project “is necessary or convenient” for the public. When commission members reluctantly voted to reject the project last year, they acknowledged that the proposal was squarely in the public interest and would result in millions of dollars of savings for electric customers, thanks to the low cost of wind power.

Read the rest on the site

« Back to the blog